|
Professional coaching
focuses on an individual’s life as it relates to setting
goals, creating results, and managing personal change. Because
coaching is a relatively new profession (having
taken the name in the 1980s), and because it implements
skills drawn from other helping and consultative
disciplines, people often want to know: what’s the
difference between counseling (or therapy) and
coaching?
We’ve set out a number of different ways
of looking at the different disciplines of coaching and
psychotherapy, and we will examine
them in increasing depth as we go down the
page.
The Quick
Study Flaws
in Most Distinctions A More Detailed
View
The Quick
Study
Let’s say you wanted to learn to drive a
car. If you hired a:
Therapist,
the therapist would help you find out what might be
holding you back from driving the car. He would delve
into your past to discover what kinds of experience you
have had with automobiles.
Consultant,
the consultant would bring you an owner’s manual and
tell you everything you ever wanted to know about the
workings of a car. The consultant would then leave you. She might return six months later to see how you had
managed the actual driving part.
Mentor, the
mentor would share her experiences of driving cars and
the wisdom and lessons she had learned in her more rich
experience with the matter.
Coach, the
coach would seat you in the car, place himself in the
passenger seat, and encourage, endorse, acknowledge and
support you until you felt comfortable enough to go it
alone.
Flaws in Most
Distinctions
If you go on many
life coaching websites, or read through books on coaching,
you’ll often see something quite facile like this: “A
therapist typically works with a dysfunctional person to
get them to functional. A coach works with a functional
person to get them to exceptional.” Both of these
sentences are over-simplifications, and they seem
designed to make the reader want to see himself as the
ideal coaching client; worse, if you listen closely you
can actually hear the coach patting him- or herself on
the back.
Particularly with
psychology's belated interest in positive psychology
(the study of states above zero, or of what makes
us happy or joyful), the distinctions are no longer so
full of bright lines, though it's still true that most
psychologists and most of the clients who seek them out
still fall into the definition of "traditional
counseling" we offer below.
That said, the
primary distinction lies in the client’s need and
intention. Generally speaking, clients seek:
• Traditional
counseling when they sense something is wrong. •
Coaching when they sense something is not quite right,
or off a bit, or out of balance – note the distinctions
in degree, wherein things aren’t as you’d like them to
be.
• Coaching when they want to focus more on changing
future behavior.
A More Detailed
View
While types of
therapy vary widely, and some are more successful than
others, some of the fundamental distinctions between
coaching and the most popular types of counseling are as
follows:
|
Traditional
Therapy or Counseling |
Coaching |
| Primary Life
Focus |
A person’s
past, which usually includes some form of trauma.
Deals with healing emotional pain or conflict
within an individual or in a relationship between
two people. BUT: some forms of therapy, or
individual therapists, do focus on
the future. |
A person’s
present, in order to help them design and act
toward the future. While positive feelings may be
a natural outgrowth, the primary focus is on
creating actionable strategies for achieving
specific goals in one's work or personal life. The
emphasis in a coaching relationship is on action,
accountability and follow through.
BUT: a responsible coach knows
when it’s useful to look at the past, precisely
because the past informs the present, as well as
in order to help extinguish limiting belief
systems.
|
| Subject
Focus |
Feelings |
Action and
outcomes |
| Model |
Medical or
clinical, relying on diagnosis of pathology or
relationship conflicts |
Learning/developmental, focusing on
attainable goals and possibilities |
| Nature of
Issue |
Identifiable
dysfunction |
A generally
functional client desiring a better
situation |
| Treatment of
the Past |
Understand
and resolve the past |
Understanding
the past as the context in which future goals are
set |
| Questions
Asked |
WHY? |
HOW? WHAT? Asking WHY, a form of seeking insight, is
emphasized less than action |
| Client
Goals |
Help patients
resolve old pain and improve emotional
states |
Helps clients
learn new skills and tools to build a more
satisfying successful future; focuses on
goals |
| Accountability for
Goals |
The goals of
therapy are often necessarily vague or intangible,
or not easily measured. It can be difficult (even
undesirable) to identify success with much
particularity |
Coaching
goals, like business goals, usually have to do
with one’s external world and behavior, and
therefore can be measured. |
| Relationship |
Doctor-patient relationship (The
therapist is the expert) |
Co-creative
equal partnership (The coach offers
perspectives and helps the clients discover their
own answers) |
| Function |
The Therapist
diagnoses, then provides professional expertise
and guidelines to provide a path to healing
|
The Coach
stands with the clients and helps him or her
identify the challenges, then partners to turn
challenges into victories, holding client
accountable to reach desired goals |
| Training or
Educational Background |
Therapists
require extensive expertise in the subject matter
of the therapy: marital counseling, childhood
abuse, etc. A therapist can try to
coach. |
Coaches, who
deal in process, do not require subject matter
expertise. But coaches cannot try to be
therapists. |
| Style
|
Patient,
nurturing, evocative, indirect, parenting,
cathartic |
The same,
excepting parenting, but also catalytic,
challenging, direct, straight talk,
accountability |
| Rate of
Change |
Progress is
often slow and painful because the issues are
often subconscious and fundamental |
Growth and
progress are rapid and usually
enjoyable |
| Responsibility for
Outcomes |
The therapist
is responsible for both the process and the
outcome |
The coach is
responsible for the process; the client for the
results |
| Disclosure |
Limited, if
any, personal disclosure by the
therapist |
Personal
disclosure by the coach used when relevant as an
aid to communicating (a similarity with
mentoring) |
| Payment |
Often covered
in some part by insurance; almost never by any
other third-party |
Not covered
by insurance; employers may pay for coaching of
individuals |
Contact us
for a free
coaching consultation about
coaching and counseling of a quite different kind now.
Related
Articles:
"What Does a Good Coach
Do? The Life and Mind Coach"
Life Coach
On Life Coaching
Business Coach
On Business Coaching
Executive Coach
On Executive Coaching
Leadership Coach
Leadership
Training
|